Monday, June 15, 2015

Accuser Jails 43 "Deniers": 5 Years Later All found Innocent

A "witch hunt" is defined as systematic actions by authority to seek out culturally repulsive behavior using inadequate defining criteria and then punishing individuals for the behavior with insufficient evidence.  The punishments and persecution are implemented without meeting typical minimum legal standards and fail recognize the rights of the accused to fully respond to allegations.  In the case described below the accused were subjected to extensive interrogation and many were jailed (some for years) for child sexual abuse that never occurred.   In the story below, intiated as a result of "Recovered Memory Therapy" 43 people were arrested, 8 were convicted and served prison sentences (one for 5 years).  All were exonerated.

   
  Wenatchee, Washington, got world attention in 1994-1995, when it found itself in the midst of what was characterized as history's most extensive child sex abuse investigation. Three years later, the investigations had fallen apart amidst accusations of abuses by police and state social workers, and alleged false confessions, badgered child witnesses, and evidence based on the generally discredited "recovered memory" theory. The cases eventually came to be known as the "Wenatchee Witch Hunt".
.
Sensational Allegations, Questionable Confessions
     Sensational allegations included the existence of a group called "The Circle" made up of mothers and fathers trading their children for ritual sex abuse, and black-clad adults in sunglasses holding large scale orgies around Wenatchee.
Forty-three adults were arrested and accused of 29,726 counts of sexually abusing 60 children. Some were released. Eighteen pleaded guilty, mostly on the basis of signed confessions. Ten were convicted at trial. Three were acquitted. Eighteen went to prison.
     Many witnesses and defendants later said they were pressured into making false confessions and accusations by caseworkers from the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and by Wenatchee Police Department Lieutenant Bob Perez.
     All who confessed later recanted. Some defendants said that when threatened with life imprisonment, they pled guilty to lesser charges. Some said they were told that if they confessed they wouldn't go to jail but would be treated in the community. Many were told they would never see their children again unless they signed a confession. Those questioned also said they were told that their children wouldn't be placed in foster care or put up for adoption if they signed confessions.
.
Children Grilled, Called Liars
     Child witnesses, mostly from 9 to 13 years old, were often taken from their families and placed in foster care. Many said later that they were subjected to hours of frightening grilling and if they didn't believe they had been sexually abused, they were told they were "in denial" or had suppressed the memory of the abuse. They were also told that siblings and other children had witnessed their abuse, or that that their parents had already confessed.
     Interrogators called some children who denied abuse liars. Children were told that if they agreed to accusations they wouldn't be separated from parents or siblings. Many of them later recanted. Lieutenant Perez neither recorded nor kept notes of his interrogations.
     Recantations were ignored. "It's well known that children are telling the truth when they say they've been abused," Wenatchee Child Protective Services (CPS) supervisor Tim Abbey later told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. "But (they) are usually lying when they deny it." Abbey also told an investigator that CPS interviews in the Wenatchee cases were not taped because tapes of the interviews in the California's notorious McMartin pre-school case, in which no one was convicted, had been thrown out on "technicalities." In fact, the McMartin tapes showed investigators browbeating and prompting children, and successfully getting them to weave fantastic stories.
     Some children and adolescents were involuntarily committed by DSHS to Pine Crest Hospital across the Washington state line, in Idaho where laws allowing involuntarily commitment of juveniles are more lax. One teenaged girl was taken to Pine Crest strapped to a gurney. There, they say they were drugged and pressured to testify against parents and other adults before they could be released.
     Many of the accused were poor, and some were developmentally disabled, and illiterate. These defendants mostly relied on public defenders. The few with private attorneys fared better.
.
How It All Began
     It began in February of 1992, when school authorities questioned Donna Everett, the seven-year-old daughter of Harold and Idella Everett. The Everetts were a large, poor family. Harold was illiterate and Idella was developmentally disabled with an IQ of 58.
     When questioned, Donna said two six-year-old boys had touched her genitals, a statement corroborated by her brother. Child Protective Services (CPS), a division of the state Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), and police investigated. Suspicious of sex abuse in the Everett home, the authorities convinced the Everetts to voluntarily put Donna in foster care.
A month later, after repeated questioning, Donna said she had been molested by a family acquaintance. This man initially denied molesting Donna, but then signed a confession, which he may not have understood, as he spoke little English. He was later convicted.
     Nevertheless the Everett family continued to be questioned and investigated. A year later, Donna's twin brothers told authorities their father had hit them with a belt. Everett was then ordered out of the home, leaving Idella to manage the family alone.
     The twins were placed in separate foster homes. At one point, three of the children were sent to the mental hospital in Idaho, and CPS placed another child in therapy. Donna was placed in foster care with Robert Devereux, the divorced foster-father of several girls. Eventually, Devereux said he couldn't handle Donna. She was then placed as a foster child in the home of Lieutenant Bob Perez.
     Perez had recently been put in charge of sex abuse cases by the Wenatchee Police Department as part of a routine rotation system.  In August 1994, one of the girls at the Devereux home tried to poison the foster-father with iodine after he grounded her. She was taken to juvenile hall. While there, Bob Perez interviewed her, and she accused Devereux of molesting her. The other girls in the Devereux home didn't back up her story, and the accuser later recanted to her DSHS caseworker, Paul Glassen, saying Perez had pressured and intimidated her.
     Devereux was arrested, however, and another foster daughter in his home was re-interviewed by Perez. After several hours of questioning, she changed her story and said she too had been molested.
     Devereux hired a lawyer and the charges against him were eventually dismissed after he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault for spanking a child and for warning two people that they were about to be arrested. He later received a settlement of $290,000 from the city of Wenatchee in exchange for his dropping a malicious prosecution and negligent investigation lawsuit.
.
Dissenters Fired and Arrested
     Also arrested was caseworker Paul Glassen. After he had reported the recantation of the child witness who first accused Devereux, Glassen was handcuffed at work and arrested for witness tampering.
     Those charges were eventually dropped, but Glassen was fired and was later investigated for being a participant in the alleged orgies run by "The Circle." After Glassen moved with his family to Vancouver, Canada, Perez and a CPS worker told the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that he was being investigated for 50 counts of child abuse, and he lost his job there. Glassen later received a $295,000 settlement from the city of Wenatchee, and a letter clearing him of any charges.
     Glassen's supervisor, Juana Vasquez, who questioned the investigation and the placement of children in foster care to facilitate criminal investigations, was also fired. A jury later awarded her a judgment of $1.57 million in her suit against the state for wrongful termination and retaliation.
     In September 1994, Donna Everett, now living as a foster-daughter with Bob Perez and his wife Luci, accused her parents, Idella and Harold Everett, of molesting her. The next day Perez got a similar accusation from her sister Melinda. Idella and Everett were arrested and duly signed confessions. Their conviction was overturned in 1998, and they got back parental rights to four of their five children. The oldest had been adopted by a family in Wisconsin, and had become a legal adult. Melinda and Donna have now both recanted and say they were pressured by Perez to lie. The Everetts received an undisclosed settlement from the city of Wenatchee.
     After the Everetts were arrested, their pastor, unordained Pentecostal minister, Robert "Roby" Roberson, tried to get custody of the oldest Everett child. Roberson had originally become involved when DSHS personnel asked them to keep an eye on the family look for signs of abuse. He believed the Everetts were innocent. A CPS caseworker told Roberson that Perez would arrest him if he attempted to contact his parishioners, the Everett children. At Idella Everett's sentencing, Roberson spoke up in her defense. Roberson later reported that Perez said, "We warned you, Roberson, we warned you," at the sentencing hearing.
Some of the Everett children were at the Children's Home Society, but Perez urged that they be moved since the counselors there wouldn't make good prosecution witnesses. State authorities went along with his request.
Perez continued to interview two Everett girls -- his foster daughter Donna and her sister Melinda, who was also a foster child in the Perez home for a time. Eventually, Donna accused almost every adult she knew in Douglas and Chelan counties. She named many children she knew as victims. Some of these children were then interviewed, and later said they were pressured to accuse their parents.
The sisters described adults standing in line to have sex with children. They named foster parent Robert Devereux and Paul Glassen -- the social worker who had been arrested earlier when he reported a child's recantation. Eventually, the girls named over a hundred abusers.
     At one point, Perez drove Donna around Wenatchee in Douglas County and East Wenatchee, in Chelan country, in his police car and she pointed at 22 homes where she said had been abused in orgies. She also pointed at a taxi driver and a deliveryman. In the back seat, CPS caseworkers took down all the names and addresses.
     Arrests were made, and although some of the 43 arrested had charges dismissed, others confessed, were sentenced, and went to prison or were tried and found guilty. In 1995, when the investigations were at their height, Douglas county commissioners and Douglas and Chelan county prosecutors asked for a grant of state funds to pay for the burgeoning costs of foster care, counselors, expert witnesses, and more prosecutors and police. They received $141,098. Public defenders, however received no extra funds.
.
Questions
     But some Wenatchee citizens began questioning the investigation. Pastor Roberson attended a city council meeting and afterwards gave a television interview about the cases.
     The day after the interview aired, Douglas County police and the State Patrol searched the church and Roberson's home, removing carpet samples to look for semen. About a week later, the Roberson's four-year old daughter Becky was taken from them and held as a material witness.
     Eventually, Roberson and his wife Connie were accused of running organized ritual sex abuse from the East Wenatchee Pentecostal Church and House of God and food bank.  At their December 1995 trial, which featured little Becky as a defense witness, a Chelan county jury acquitted them in three hours. The jury foreman characterized the prosecutions as "a witch hunt."  A Sunday school teacher,  Honnah Sims, was also acquitted, and charges were dropped against the driver of the church van.  The Robersons and their co-defendant settled a lawsuit with the state for $850,000 in December 1999.
.
Innocence Project Northwest
     In 1998, law students and faculty at the University of Washington formed Innocence Project Northwest and took up the cases of the convicted and incarcerated.  Eventually, all 18 had verdicts overturned, or made plea bargains to reduced, often unrelated charges.  Some, however, had served their full terms while appeals were underway.  The last of the 18 defendants was released in December 2000.
     More than a dozen civil lawsuits filed by those arrested and by child witnesses against the city of Wenatchee, DSHS, Bob Perez, and other individuals involved in the investigations and prosecutions continue to work their way through the courts.
====================================
Communication with Grace on her birthday just prior to treatment in Walla Walla, Washington:

======================================================================
===================================
WARNING
If you are seeking help for personal struggles and a therapist, counselor or friend says that "recovering childhood memories can help you get better" then IMMEDIATELY get up from your chair (or off the couch), run to the door, open it and flee. Hundreds of thousands have lost families, years of productive living and squandered immense wealth with tragedy inducing therapy that produces horrid false memories, splinters families, isolates the client and is documented to cause decline in mental health.
======================================================================

Monday, June 8, 2015

Reflection: Candy Cane and the Bear

The Candy Cane and the Bear
by Deborah David 

She came to realize her vivid and horrid memories she once held were actually false (also known as a "retractor"). 

       How is it that one can believe that something is happening, or happened that never even took place in reality? I have been asked that question many times. People want to know why it is I could believe something that had no basis in reality. Let me try to explain as best as I can from my point of view as having lived through this. I do not consider those things I saw in my mind's eye as memories, they never were memories, they were not a reality of my experience. They could be called "fantasies" if you wish, for lack of a better word, or "visualizations" whatever they can be called, they were not memory.
       I recall reading somewhere, something about us being very visual beings. We see things in pictures. We can form a picture from the words we read. When someone tells us a story, we also form a picture to go with the words. If I tell you there is a bear climbing a candy cane. You can form the picture. Later when you are told you saw a bear on a candy cane you will recall the same picture as you had previously formed. At this point you are probably not making any interpretation to the picture. I mean you are probably not thinking of it in terms of a memory of experience.
       Now a person asks you if you have seen a bear on a candy cane and you will probably say no, because you know you haven't seen such a thing in reality. But suppose this person insists you saw a bear on a candy cane. Suppose you are vulnerable at the time. Suppose the person insists this took place though you are questioning the reality of seeing a real bear on a candy cane. Suppose you are given an explanation (repression/dissociation/splitting etc.) as to why you do not remember seeing a bear on a candy cane. Suppose this is being told to you over and over again by someone you have put your trust in. Suppose you are thinking about it so much, constantly being told it did happen that you start to see bears and candy canes in your dreams, which become more and more strange and involved. Suppose along with a person telling you that indeed you did experience seeing a bear on a candy cane you are given material to read that tells you other people have also seen a bear on a candy cane and not remembered it. Suppose too, that you soon are meeting people who tell you of the bears they have seen on candy canes which they also did not know about until recently. Suppose you are told you have to recover seeing even more bears on candy canes so you will be well.
       And through it all you are told you have to believe it took place. That indeed you saw, touched and physically experienced seeing a bear on a candy cane. You are told to feel what it was like to see a bear on a candy cane. "I bet you were afraid, angry and frustrated?" "Did you want to cry?" "You couldn't do anything, could you, you were so small and little, and helpless." You are told to pay attention to what your body is telling you about seeing this bear on a candy cane. "Did your legs feel like they needed to run?" "Did you have trouble catching your breath?" "I bet you were so terrified you just froze still." You are asked what the bear looks like, what color, how long is the fur, how big is the bear? "How many bears were there?" "How many candy canes?" "Is the candy cane red and white or a shade of pink?" "Are the stripes wide or narrow?" "Did the bear touch you, look at you, watch you?" "What did the bear do?" "How does that make you feel when you remember that?" "How big are you?" "How old are you?" "Where did you see the bear on a candy cane, the city, the country, in a car, your bedroom, your home?"
       Well, you did experience seeing a bear on a candy cane in your minds eye of pictures, you have visualized it, it is there and now you believe it is memory, indeed it really took place. What is happening to your reality? Could you continue to distinguish reality from dreams, from visualizations, from fantasies, from what you were being told? In fact, what becomes of your reality, do you still have one?
       And to further keep you confused from what is real and what is not, every time you might question the reality of actually seeing a bear on a candy cane you are told you are being resistant, in denial again, being dissociative and/or wanting to repress the truth of what happened to you because seeing a bear on a candy cane was a horrible experience and something that you don't want to remember.
       You soon ask if you are crazy, could you be making it up, are you lying? And you are told, "you are not crazy" "you are not lying" they believe you and know you are not lying, they even tell you they know it happened and it is real. You are told, "you're not making it up, someone would not make up something like that" "your body feels the fear doesn't it, you can't make that up."
       It would not be long before you could believe something that is not a memory in the sense of what memory is. Something that is a "false memory" yet not, because it never was from memory but from mind pictures caused through suggestion, dreams, visualizations and such. Once a persons reality is taken from them, how can the person find an anchor to hold onto. How can someone then distinguish what their reality actually is? They are then left to be filled with the reality of another person, to whatever that other person wants to instill into them as reality.

Further comment

       Does it take only a creative person to form a picture of a bear on a candy cane? Probably not. Does it take someone who is just suggestible, probably not. At the first instance the person probably does not believe or take the suggestion as truth, reality. They may be quite skeptical but given time, given the pounding away at the persons reality at a vulnerable time and most likely it is going to happen, "recovered memories" of what ever is being asked of the person, will emerge. Thus suggestion if part of the whole process but not necessary is it happening only to a person who could be considered suggestible. In order for suggestion to take place the person has given, by way of complete trust, their own rational thought processes and given control over to another person. A person who holds himself out as someone who has more knowledge of you then you yourself do. A person who is in a position of authority, and who is offering to help you if you follow his steps to get there. There are also many other factors that come into play on this outside mere suggestion. For all people are suggestible to a certain degree, it is when the other factors come into play that one can become more suggestible.
=============
=============================================
WARNING
  If you are seeking help for personal struggles and a therapist, counselor or friend says that "recovering childhood memories can help you get better" then IMMEDIATELY get up from your chair (or off the couch), run to the door, open it and flee. Hundreds of thousands have lost families, years of productive living and squandered immense wealth with tragedy inducing therapy that produces horrid false memories, splinters families, isolates the client and is documented to cause decline in mental health.
=====================================================================

Personal Experience: Sister Remembers


Gracie,
      I remember this one time, when you were just a kid, and you really, really wanted us to play scrabble.  Mom made special plans for us, making sure her 2 busy teenager daughters were free so that we could play scrabble after our big Saturday night meal, and I agreed to it, thinking you might forget by the end of the week.  I was teenager, and thought I was too cool for scrabble.  But, of course, you didn't forget.  You were so excited at the idea of your teenage sisters “hanging out with you”.  You talked about it all week, non-stop. As the night approached, I began to dread it more and more.   But Mom was firm.   It was an absolute “must”.  Funny thing is, that night was AWESOME!  That night, as Mom, Jenny, you, and I began to play,  I began to have fun!  We laughed and talked.   We made silly words.   I think I remember that you may have even won!  I love remembering our childhood, when we had fun and found joy...so much of it remains vivid in my memory.  I remember dancing with you,  Jenny and Luke to oldies and Christian rock in the kitchen as we cleared the table after dinner.   I remember you eating sand as a baby at the beach,  and your cute shocked face and puffy ponytail.  I remember playing 'house' outside, building cakes and a house out of mud and sticks with you, Jenny, and Luke.  I remember camping at Styks River with you.  You used to love that!  I remember our family's long, beautiful canoe trips (that canoe was best investment Dad ever made!)  I remember feeling like you always seemed to know when I was painting my nails, or writing in my journal.  I remember building dams with Luke for the 'rivers' that flooded downtown after a hard rain.  I remember the beautiful time we spent at Franciscan together, going to Mass, confession, and praise and worship 'parties.  I can't drink a cup of coffee without thinking of the many nights we stayed up drinking coffee and talking.

     I love you and I miss you so much is makes my heart hurt.  We want you and your girls to be safe from all harm, and happy. It feels like you are being lost in a prison someone is slowly building around you, or your mind. But please, please, know this: you and your girls can always be safe.  Your family is waiting with open arms.  We will always stand ready.  Because we love you.  We will always, always, want your happiness, health, and peace. We will never give up.

I love you, dear sister. Beth


ALL Pictures are of life before false memories were recovered.

======================================================================
========================================
WARNING:
 If you are seeking help for personal struggles and a therapist, counselor or friend says that "recovering childhood memories can help you get better" then IMMEDIATELY get up from your chair (or off the couch), run to the door, open it and flee. Hundreds of thousands have lost families, years of productive living and squandered immense wealth with tragedy inducing therapy that produces horrid false memories, splinters families, isolates the client and is documented to cause decline in mental health.
======================================================================















Grace and I while visiting family in New England




Personal Experience: Hope for Grace

        The wonderful letter below was given to us by Grace after we visited the previous summer (2014).
       She had not yet developed the horrid "repressed memories"  (factually false memories) while in postpartum depression, medicated with antidepressants and using "memory recovery techniques."   A previously unknown new friend, Juanita Anspach, said a therapist was "helped in getting the repressed memories."   Insured and competent counselors now avoid discredited "memory recovery therapy" (insurance companies refuse to cover any therapist using this technique).  Grace was both "medicated" and in a "blackout" (according to her own published accounts) when the horrid false memories came to exist.  We will always hope for truth to prevail.
======================================================
Here is a letter from her father.....
My Dearest Grace,
    I never took the opportunity to answer your wonderful heartfelt letter of thanks for our stay in Walla Walla in the summer of 2014.  Our discomfort and hardships was worth it (for both our families).   Your mother and I actually had fun staying in our camper trailer!
    Your appreciation and gratitude was so thoughtful that tears welled up as I read your wonderful words.  Thank you for your gratitude.
    I was uncomfortable with your sharing about shame.  This caused me to think that you did not know that I had already forgiven you.  I am so sorry if I did not make this clear.  Your wrongs are thrown as far as the east is from the west when you ask forgiveness.  In fact you have given me so much to be happy about.  You welcomed life in every situation in spite of the message of the culture that surrounds us.   You have made decisions time and time again that have brought me tears of joy.  What a wonderful and courageous daughter, totally unafraid of truth.  I love you and your Father in heaven loves you even more.
    If you are willing then we are very hopeful!  I can guarantee that after the impact of medications and the untruths fade (or are by some miracle overcome by your desire for truth) we will always be very eager to establish contact with you and your family.  I never wished to be separated from you even in the darkest hours of this current discomfort.  I await your call and contact because I trust you so deeply and am confident that you will awaken.  You are awesome and so resilient!
     I and your mother will forever await your return because we know how good you truly are.  Most of all know that none of the present discomforts will ever prevent me or your mother from caring, loving and waiting for you. You can call me, write me or visit our home anytime or have us come visit.  You are never too far away!
    We are always a phone call, chat session or email away.  We would welcome you any time.  We are ready to have you and your family come visit us or for us to visit you.
    I continue to pray for you and I love you and your family.
With Great Love,
    Your Dad


Our communication with Grace on her birthday immediately prior to treatment in Walla Walla, Washington: