False Memories Used in Supreme Court Appointment Hearings
A lawsuit seeking financial settlement long debunked "repressed memories" and "flashbacks" as evidence. Article is an example of how a confused presentation, hysteria and false accusations lead to defamation of innocents and profit for an accuser (Archived 2017).
Why are Accusers called "Victims"?
"A small group of cloistered DSM 5 "experts" stubbornly ignoring the sharp criticism from within their own group and the near universal rejection of their proposals by everyone else in the field. Drs Verheul and Livesley have performed a service in trying to stop this runaway train and in now explaining how it went off the tracks." The result is a largely unchanged widely rejected description of "personality disorders" in the DSM_5. Clinical psychologists cling to past understandings. (Archive 2012).
The Minnesota supreme court rejected the use of "repressed memories" in a case and identified submitted research supporting the memories as "junk science". (2012).
Friends help each other "recover memories"?